waterless car washing and valeting, 100% non toxic
Market Square Car Park, Mallow, Co. Cork, Ireland
1800 948 360

Secure payments by: green valet accept paypal, visa, mastercard

Green Valet facebook page

Water Policy Consultation

The Irish Gov­ern­ment has launched a con­sul­ta­tion process (Jan­u­ary 2012) con­cern­ing water pol­icy, includ­ing issues of water meter­ing and water rates, as well as plans to set up a new national water util­ity. It is invit­ing responses to its posi­tion paper, “Reform of the Water Sec­tor in Ire­land”, until 24 Feb­ru­ary 2012. The doc­u­ment offers a use­ful win­dow on gov­ern­ment think­ing and on the var­i­ous pres­sures and prob­lems that may well ulti­mately shape policy.

The posi­tion paper lays out gov­ern­ment plans to form a national water util­ity which will man­age all issues relat­ing to domes­tic and com­mer­cial water sup­ply, address envi­ron­men­tal and climage change issues, over­see imple­men­ta­tion of aspects of EU pol­icy (impor­tant dead­lines are loom­ing) and respond to changes in pop­u­la­tion nation­ally and in urban areas.

The doc­u­ment also restates the gov­ern­ment ideal of imple­ment­ing water meters in every house­hold in the coun­try, and to charge users by usage beyond a cer­tain free quota of water per house­hold. Sev­eral pres­sures emerge here.

First, while the goal is to bring in rev­enue that will meet the cost of our water sup­ply, sup­ply­ing and installing water meters will itself be costly and time con­sum­ing. The doc­u­ment con­sid­ers the pos­si­bil­ity of sim­ply intro­duc­ing a flat-rate charge, but recog­nises that, though this would require no gov­ern­ment invest­ment in meter­ing, it would not address the need to con­serve already lim­ited water sup­plies. A sec­ond option con­sid­ered is to spread instal­la­tion over a period of ten years or more, with a flat-rate charged being imposed on those with­out meters. (100,000 house­hold per year until 2021 would leave 500,000 homes unmetered.)

A fur­ther idea is to have an opt-in sys­tem where house­holds could choose to have a water meter installed, bear at least some costs of the instal­la­tion, and claw back some of those costs by acheiv­ing water usage reduc­tions. The idea is that it would prove cheaper in the long-run to install a water meter than to remain on a higher flat-rate charge. The doc­u­ment acknowl­edges that this would be socially divi­sive — more avail­able to those with greater means. Finally, the pos­si­bil­ity of installing meters only in cer­tain cat­e­gories of prop­erty is con­sid­ered, e.g. in new houses, sold houses, rental prop­er­ties, etc.

(A rather dif­fer­ent option con­sid­ered, but largely dis­missed, is to focus on repair­ing the exist­ing water net­work to elim­i­nate leak­age. How­ever, the high costs mean that sav­ings would be sig­nif­i­cantly less than the rev­enue gen­er­ated by water meter­ing. This approach would do noth­ing to change our water usage patterns.)

The fun­da­men­tal draw­back of all of these options is pretty clear: water meter­ing both as a source of rev­enue and an impe­tus towards water con­ser­va­tion will be sig­nif­i­cantly under­mined if it is not imple­mented quickly and uni­ver­sally. And many will be (rightly) unhappy with the inequal­i­ties of treat­ment any of these alter­na­tive options will gen­er­ate. At the same time, the EU/IMF deal requires that water meter­ing gen­er­ate a rev­enue stream by 2014. In this frame­work, it is not cer­tain what free domes­tic quota of water, if any, the gov­ern­ment will be able to afford.

In sum, on these issues, the posi­tion paper raises more ques­tions than it offers poten­tial solu­tions, sug­gest­ing that the con­sul­ta­tion process needs to part of a sub­stan­tial debate on these issues. In years to come, we might well come to regret deci­sions made on the basis of finan­cial prac­ti­cal­ity rather than good prac­tice, which attends to the needs of house­holds and the pres­sures upon them.

Posted in Water - Today's Challenges and Opportunities | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment
Page 1 of 212

Threat of Further Water Contamination

Ear­lier posts con­sid­ered the most recent EPA report on water qual­ity in Ire­land and the impli­ca­tions of the EU’s soon to be imple­mented 2000 Water Frame­work Direc­tive.

For a fur­ther per­spec­tive, check out Frank McDonald’s Irish Times arti­cle (Mon­day, 7 Novem­ber 2011), enti­tled “Fur­ther Water Con­t­a­m­i­na­tion Inevitable if Strict Pol­icy Not Adopted to Pro­tect Resources”.

McDon­ald high­lights the threat posed to water sup­plies by the Celtic Tiger sprawl, and specif­i­cally the uneven stan­dards of sew­er­age sys­tems and schemes installed in developments.

He also states that Ire­land faces a threat of ongo­ing, daily EU fines, if it fails to meet the stan­dards set out in the EU Water Frame­work Direc­tive, 2000.

 

Posted in In the News, Water - Today's Challenges and Opportunities | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment
Page 1 of 212

Irish Water Laws

 

Changes in Irish Water Law

The Water Ser­vices Act 2007 rep­re­sents a major change in reg­u­la­tions con­cern­ing use of water in Ire­land, which will have pro­found impact on busi­ness and domes­tic water usage into the future. The pro­vi­sions of the Act dove­tail with the EU’s Water Frame­work Direc­tive, which gives legal weight to the pol­luter pays prin­ci­ple. This prin­ci­ple requires that com­mer­cial and domes­tic water users not only pay for their water sup­ply, but for the cost of treat­ing the waste water that they pro­duce. The aim of the WFD is to min­imise the impact of human water use on the envi­ron­ment, by hav­ing the user pay for treat­ment of waste water.

While some aspects of the Act have been imple­mented, there are many pro­vi­sions that remain to be, so that its full impact has not been felt. Busi­nesses, not least, car wash­ing & valet­ing ser­vices, will be con­cerned with the laws that the Act intro­duces con­cern­ing wast­ing water, con­ser­va­tion of water, and water pol­lu­tion. Of par­tic­u­lar sig­nif­i­cance for house­holds will be what the Act has to say about water rates and water metering.

Wast­ing Water

Under the Act any per­son wil­fully wast­ing or per­mit­ting water wastage com­mits a legal offence. In par­tic­u­lar, men­tion is made of wastage due to leak­ing or inad­e­quate pipes, valves, etc., or poor man­age­ment of oper­a­tional sys­tems. The water ser­vice provider – usu­ally a local author­ity – may direct (with force of law) that the owner or occu­pier of a premises upgrade their plumb­ing or works to a stan­dard deter­mined by the ser­vice provider to elim­i­nate leaks and waste of water, and/or to intro­duce more water-efficient work prac­tices. More­over, the water ser­vice provider may restrict the amount of water sup­plied to the premises, usu­ally with notice, but with imme­di­ate effect if con­cerned that human health, the envi­ron­ment or the integrity of the water pro­vi­sion sys­tem are threat­ened. Any finan­cial costs or losses due to the restric­tion or even cutting-off of a water sup­ply in these cir­cum­stances are borne by the owner or occu­pier in question.

Con­ser­va­tion of Water

The Min­is­ter for the Envi­ron­ment is given sig­nif­i­cant pow­ers to alter estab­lished pat­terns of water usage in order to con­serve water. S/he can not only issue direc­tives about water con­ser­va­tion, but can require the intro­duc­tion of spe­cific devices or sys­tems to reduce water use. The Min­is­ter can also require the intro­duc­tion of tech­nolo­gies or sys­tems to col­lect, treat (to a spec­i­fied stan­dard), and re-use (for pur­poses other than human con­sump­tion) “storm water” (i.e. rain­wa­ter) or “grey water” (water already used on a premises, but not in toi­lets or uri­nals, and not oth­er­wise seri­ously con­t­a­m­i­nated by use).

Already famil­iar is the pro­vi­sion that, if there is a water short­age or threat of water short­age, a water ser­vice provider may pro­hibit using a hosepipe to water a gar­den, parks or sports grounds, water or spray crops, or to wash a car or other vehi­cle. And, as many com­mer­cial car washes will have expe­ri­enced dur­ing and after the cold snaps of the last cou­ple of win­ters, water ser­vice providers can pro­hibit or restrict water use in com­mer­cial car wash­ing ser­vices dur­ing times of shortage.

Water Pol­lu­tion

A sig­nif­i­cant change intro­duced by the Act con­cerns the water run-off from trade premises. Prior to this Act, col­lec­tion and treat­ment of run-off water were typ­i­cally of con­cern only to highly reg­u­lated sec­tors such as agri­cul­ture, heavy indus­try, or the chem­i­cal indus­try. The Act now pro­vides that any dis­charge, by any premises, of trade efflu­ent or other mat­ter into a sewer owned or con­trolled by the water author­ity or any storm drain, will be an offence, unless it is done under licence. And such licences are granted sub­ject to the envi­ron­men­tal or human effects of such dis­charges, and can be refused or reviewed. This pro­vi­sion will have a direct and seri­ous impact on car wash­ing busi­nesses, which will have to col­lect and treat any runoff that is con­t­a­m­i­nated with toxic chemicals.

Con­se­quences for businesses

To recap, the Water Ser­vices Act 2007 will have sig­nif­i­cant impact on busi­nesses when fully imple­mented, espe­cially those which are tra­di­tion­ally heavy water-users. Busi­nesses will have to:

  • Cut out water wastage
  • Intro­duce water-efficient tech­nolo­gies and work practices
  • Col­lect, treat and (where pos­si­ble) estab­lish means of re-using run-off from their var­i­ous processes, and not allow run-off to enter sewer sys­tems or drains
  • Col­lect and, where appro­pri­ate, use storm water
  • Bear the costs of imple­ment­ing the above measures

In response to these chal­lenges, Green­Valet has devel­oped a com­plete solu­tion for car wash & valet­ing busi­nesses, which can be used with water­less and water-based sys­tems. GreenValet’s water­less car wash sys­tem com­pletely elim­i­nates use of toxic sub­stances and prac­ti­cally elim­i­nates run-off. Our solu­tion for water-based car wash sys­tem imme­di­ately ren­ders such a busi­ness 100% non-toxic and sig­nif­i­cantly reduces water usage.

Water Meter­ing

The Act also pro­vides for the intro­duc­tion of water meter­ing and water charges. Once intro­duced, water meters are manda­tory and the local author­ity can recoup the costs of sup­ply­ing and fit­ting the meters via a rental charge, though the Act allows that meters might be sup­plied free of charge. What peo­ple may not be aware of is that the Act also allows for meter­ing of domes­tic waste water. All the water from a house­hold that ends up enter­ing the drains or sew­ers can be metered and users can be charged accord­ingly. This is already the case in the UK, for instance, where the charge for waste water can be as high as the charge for a water sup­ply in the first place. The chal­lenge then for house­holds will be to

  • not to waste water
  • be water-efficient
  • re-use grey-water
  • col­lect and use rain­wa­ter (other than for human consumption)

Green­Valet water­less car clean­ing prod­ucts and domes­tic clean­ing prod­ucts will help you reduce both domes­tic water usage and the amount of chem­i­cals intro­duced into your waste water.

For great water sav­ings, see our Top Ten Water-Saving Tips.

Posted in Water - Today's Challenges and Opportunities | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments
Page 1 of 212

The EU — The Polluter Pays

The EU Water Frame­work Directive

In 2000, the Euro­pean Union issued its Water Frame­work Direc­tive (WFD). This direc­tive called for a more holis­tic approach to how water qual­ity and lev­els of water pol­lu­tion are assessed. It placed the focus on river basins, because this is where most cities, towns, indus­tries and agri­cul­tural activ­i­ties are cen­tred, and because rivers are a pri­mary source of water for domes­tic and other uses. (It also takes other water sys­tems into account.) The WFD directed that, in future, water qual­ity and water pol­lu­tion must be assessed, not sim­ply by water test­ing against a given stan­dard, but by exam­in­ing the impact of human activ­ity upon the ecosys­tem of a river basin or water sys­tem as a whole. The impact on ani­mal and plant life, changes in water chem­istry and in hydro­mor­phol­ogy, will deter­mine whether a water sys­tem is judged to have good qual­ity water.

This move raises the bar for water qual­ity test­ing, chal­leng­ing any temp­ta­tion to set stan­dards that might be more eas­ily met, but which would have an envi­ron­men­tal cost. Every EU coun­try must achieve a ‘good’ sta­tus in all of their sig­nif­i­cant river basins and water sys­tems by 2015. To see where Ire­land stands in rela­tion to these stan­dards, see our blog post Water Qual­ity in Ire­land.

 

The Pol­luter Pays

Another sig­nif­i­cant, related direc­tive of the WFD is that the pol­luter pays prin­ci­ple should inform not only pol­icy around major pol­lu­tion inci­dents, but water sup­ply and waste water charges as well. This has far-reaching impli­ca­tions. The pol­luter pays prin­ci­ple says that indus­tries, busi­nesses and agri­cul­ture must pay for the cost of water sup­plies and also for any waste water treat­ment of the run-off from their plants, premises or farms. All such costs asso­ci­ated with main­tain­ing water qual­ity are to be built into users’ water charges.

How­ever, almost every human use of water pol­lutes it. Domes­tic wash­ing, clean­ing, toi­let and sewer sys­tems, all add dirt, waste and chem­i­cals to the water we use. And so the pol­luter pays prin­ci­ple applies to domes­tic water usage too. Under the WFD, domes­tic users will pay for the water they use and also for the post-use treat­ment of that water. This is already the case in the UK, where domes­tic users can pay as much for the quan­tity of waste water they allow flow into the sew­ers as for the water they draw from the water sup­ply in the first place. (Waste water is also metered). The chal­lenge for house­holds will be to min­imise water use and to min­imise their pol­lu­tion of that water.

Water Charges

The WFD does not allow gov­ern­ments to profit from water charges, but the direc­tive rec­om­mends two poli­cies which will push water charges upward. First, gov­ern­ments are directed to price water at a suf­fi­ciently high level so as that users will be moti­vated to reduce their water usage. (Higher water charges, together with more water-efficient tech­nolo­gies, have been an impor­tant fac­tor in falling domes­tic water usage in many Euro­pean coun­tries.) Sec­ond, gov­ern­ments are encour­aged to take a long-term eco­nomic view. In prin­ci­ple, this means that prices might fall due to antic­i­pated falling costs of sup­ply­ing water in the future. In prac­tice, it is more likely to mean that gov­ern­ments will fac­tor into cur­rent prices antic­i­pated future increases in the cost of main­tain­ing an ade­quate water sup­ply due to higher demand, increased indus­trial activ­ity, the need to replace or upgrade infra­struc­ture, or more exact­ing envi­ron­men­tal stan­dards, etc.

The Chal­lenges Ahead

In 2007, the Irish Gov­ern­ment enacted the Water Ser­vices Act, which goes some way toward meet­ing the require­ments of the EU direc­tive, though many of the Act’s pro­vi­sions remain to be fully imple­mented. As they are imple­mented, the chal­lenge for house­holds and busi­nesses will be

  • to reduce water use through elim­i­na­tion of water wastage
  • to reduce water use through water-efficient prac­tices and equipment
  • to min­imise con­t­a­m­i­na­tion of water used
  • to re-use grey-water appropriately
  • to col­lect and use rain­wa­ter appropriately

GreenValet’s water­less car clean­ing & valet­ing prod­ucts and domes­tic clean­ing prod­ucts offer house­holds sig­nif­i­cant ways of reduc­ing their water usage.

For car valet­ing busi­nesses and the auto indus­try, GreenValet’s Com­plete Car Clean­ing & Valet­ing Solu­tion offers a 100% non-toxic water­less sys­tem and a water-based sys­tem, which will reduce water use sig­nif­i­cantly and which is 100% non-toxic.

See our Top 10 Water Sav­ing Tips.

Posted in Car Care Essentials, Water - Today's Challenges and Opportunities | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments
Page 1 of 212

Top 10 Water Saving Tips

 

As you replace your exist­ing house­hold equip­ment, choose the water-efficient mod­els avail­able and you will save on your water usage. You might even decide that it is worth upgrad­ing an item such as a wash­ing machine for greater water effi­ciency. How­ever, there are many prac­ti­cal things that you can do at low cost or no cost at all that will save lots of water.

1. Install a low-flow show­er­head and tap aerators

Reduc­ing from a show­er­head with a flow-rate of 9 litres per minute to, say, a 6 litres per minute low-flow show­er­head saves 24 litres of water dur­ing an 8-minute shower. Tap aer­a­tors add air into your water flow, pro­duc­ing a bub­bly stream of water that reduces the flow rate but main­tains the effec­tive­ness of a stronger flow.

2. Have a shorter shower

Some­times water sav­ing is this sim­ple. If you nor­mally spend 8 min­utes in the shower, have a 6 minute shower instead. This is an auto­matic 25% water sav­ing, and will save you 14–18 litres of water per shower. (Over 60% of Irish peo­ple spend 10 min­utes or more in the shower.) A five-minute shower is eas­ily pos­si­ble. In areas Aus­tralia with water short­ages, 3–4 minute show­ers are the norm. One Aus­tralian con­ser­va­tion group has even come up with a method for hav­ing a one-minute shower!

3. Place a plas­tic bot­tle filled with water/pebbles in toi­let cistern

Care­fully plac­ing a one litre bot­tle of peb­bles or water into your toi­let cis­tern will save you 1 litre per flush. Depend­ing on the size of the cis­tern and the plac­ing of its flush mech­a­nism, you may be able to add more or larger dis­place­ments, sav­ing even more water. Also, don’t use your toi­let as a waste dis­posal mech­a­nism – throw those used tis­sues in the bin, don’t flush them away.

4. Don’t let water run­ning while wash­ing hands, brush­ing teeth

    Allow­ing the tap to run for 2 min­utes while you brush your teeth or wash your hands uses about 12 litres of water. When wash­ing your hands put the plug in the sink and add only the water you need. When brush­ing your teeth, use a glass of water for rinsing.

    5. Fix drip­ping taps

    A drip­ping tap can waste a huge quan­tity of water. Lim­er­ick County Coun­cil esti­mate that a drip­ping tap can waste up to 90 litres per day. Even a loss of 20 litres a day (about one drip per sec­ond) would add up to over 7,500 litres of water in a year.

    6. Full clothes washes

    Even an effi­cient, mod­ern wash­ing machine will use 45 litres of water in a sin­gle wash. One full-load instead of two half-filled washes will mean 45 litres used instead of 90 litres.

    7. Full dish­washer loads

    A newer model dish­washer will use about 20 litres of water. An older model might use almost dou­ble that. Turn on your dish­washer only when it is full and you will save lots of water.

    8. Use plugged sink or bowl when rins­ing dishes or wash­ing vegetables

    Allow­ing taps to run while rins­ing dishes or wash­ing veg­eta­bles uses about 6 litres of water per minute. Using a bowl or plugged sink will use a small frac­tion of that. A bowl of water used to rinse veg­eta­bles can be re-used to water plants.

    9. Water­less car washing

    Amaz­ingly, wash­ing your car at home with a hosepipe can use any­thing from 300 to 450 litres of water! Wash­ing with a bucket and sponge uses about 30 litres (4 buck­ets). Water­less car prod­ucts can reduce the amount of water used prac­ti­cally to zero.

    10. Col­lect rain­wa­ter in a water butt

    Water­ing your gar­den or wash­ing down your vehi­cles, dri­ve­way, foot­paths or patio area uses a lot of water, espe­cially if you use a hose. Why not install a water butt to col­lect rain­wa­ter from your drain­pipes for these pur­poses. Any­thing from 100 litres capac­ity to 750 litre capac­ity and beyond is pos­si­ble, accord­ing to your needs, space and budget.

    Posted in Water - Today's Challenges and Opportunities | Tagged , , | 13 Comments
    Page 1 of 212