Threat of Further Water Contamination
Earlier posts considered the most recent EPA report on water quality in Ireland and the implications of the EU’s soon to be implemented 2000 Water Framework Directive.
For a further perspective, check out Frank McDonald’s Irish Times article (Monday, 7 November 2011), entitled “Further Water Contamination Inevitable if Strict Policy Not Adopted to Protect Resources”.
McDonald highlights the threat posed to water supplies by the Celtic Tiger sprawl, and specifically the uneven standards of sewerage systems and schemes installed in developments.
He also states that Ireland faces a threat of ongoing, daily EU fines, if it fails to meet the standards set out in the EU Water Framework Directive, 2000.
Water Quality in Ireland
The Irish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recently published, Water Quality in Ireland 2007-09, the latest in a series of three-year reports tracking levels of Irish water quality. The report points to some areas of improvement, but also highlights significant water quality problems that ought to cause serious concern.
Water quality in groundwater, rivers, lakes, canals, estuaries and coastal waters are examined in the report, using two different forms of assessment. The EPA uses a new assessment framework set out by the EU’s Water Framework Directive (WFD, 2000), whose standards Ireland must meet by 2015. The WFD uses a scale of High, Good, Moderate, Poor, Bad, where a High or Good status implies that there is almost no human impact on a given body of water. The requirement for 2015 is that all current High status waters be protected and all other waters be brought up to a Good level. The EPA also continues to use (for comparison purposes) the generally less stringent assessment criteria it has used in past reports.
Groundwater
About 25% of all Irish drinking water is sourced from groundwater, with groundwater also an important source of river and surface water. Under WFD criteria, 85% of groundwater is assessed as Good/High and 15% is Poor – a good result. Nitrate and phosphate levels were also lower on the whole in groundwater, if increasing in some areas of the country, and the report notes that heavy rainfall during the testing period may have artificially suppressed levels. A significant worry is that 34% of samples were shown to contain faecal coliform bacteria – human or animal faecal waste being the usual source.
Rivers & Lakes
Under WFD criteria, only 52% of river basin waters attain the necessary High or Good rating, 28% are Moderate and 20% are Poor or Bad. Under the older, less demanding classification system, the percentage of unpolluted rivers rise to 69%, but even this represents a 10% drop over the past 20 years.
Again, under WFD classifications, only 47% of lakes achieved the required High or Good status, with some 41% Moderate. The main problem here appears to be algal bloom, due to phosphate levels. Under the older EPA classification approximately 80% of lakes would count as satisfactory. These results for rivers and lakes are worrying as they are a major source of our domestic water supply.
A positive development is that fish kills are down significantly on previous reports. Two three-year periods in the 1980s reported over 220 fish kills in each, mainly from agricultural pollution, 2008 saw 32 fish kills, and 2009 sixteen, none of these sixteen having an agricultural source.
“Priority hazardous substances” such as herbicides, pesticides and metals do not appear to be a significant cause for concern, though acceptable levels are exceeded in a small number of cases.
Canals
Almost all canals reached the minimum WFD standard required.
Estuaries and Coastal Regions
There have been significant improvements in these categories, due to licensing of waste water processes and increased secondary treatment of waste water. Nonetheless, only 46% of estuaries and coastal achieved a WFD High or Good status.
Conclusions
Overall, Ireland scores a creditable 85% Good/High status on groundwater quality and a more worrying 50% or so across all surface waters. Further significant improvements are needed in industry, businesses and agriculture, but also far greater attention is needed to domestic water waste and its treatment. Pollution from a specific point source is quite often linked, by the report, to inadequate waste water treatment systems in domestic houses and housing developments.
The report does not envisage significant improvement in Irish water quality or a meeting of EU standards without significant investment. At the same time, its call for enthusiasm and vigilance on the part of local authority workers, might be extended to us all, whether domestic, business, industry or agricultural users of water. We need enthusiasm for greater protection of our water resources, vigilance about the kinds of waste and pollutants we allow contaminate them, and creativity in finding new greener, more water-efficient practices.
If you wish to delve into the report, you will find it here. You might also like to consult a more detailed analysis of the report’s findings on IrishEnvironment.com.


